Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Why I wargame

Why do I wargame?

Well, that is a question a wife and a couple of former girlfriends have asked me, but never a bloke. I would like to say it is because such attractive young ladies as pictured above are thrilled to play such games themselves but, more importantly, they also like to hang around aging, slightly pudgy, graying, gentlemen, but I can't. Instead, read below for the more mundane answer the question

The answer is both simple and complex. Simple, in that I enjoy the collecting miniature "armies", I love the history (even science fiction and fantasy wargaming have some sort of history as fluff), the banter between players is amusing, and it brings together folks who might otherwise pass by each other on the street without so much as a "good day."

On the other hand, my answer is also very complex. The nuances of game design serve to "push my buttons" so to speak, depending upon the game. I like games which are strategy > twitch, decisions > luck of the dice/cards, and those which especially put me into a critical decision loop without having to be shot at in real life. The span of history is rich with social and political developments which were rooted in military achievements and outcomes. It is this interaction with real human history that inflames my passion for historical gaming, but also provides a foundation for my keen interest in science fiction and fantasy gaming as well.

Games which inspire the imagination really get to me. So much so that I have small notebooks, loose papers, and binders full of game ideas and designs from nearly thirty years ago to the present. In fact, I am currently in the process of developing rules for a miniature game, a boardgame, a card game, and an online miniature wargame campaign. Aside from the latter, I may not actually publish these embryonic designs, but it is the process of design, the critical thinking evolving into a logical play experience, which provides further fuel for my passion of gaming.


Like many of my generation, the original Dungeons & Dragons certainly filled the niche of which I am apart. Not the same niche as that of this group of freaks below (admittedly, the elfin chick in the back row, second from left, would not be kicked out of my bed for eating crackers, but her friends need to be institutionalized).
But more like this:
My parents were very much against D&D, almost from the start, as they heard anecdote after anecdote of how "satanic" and "deviant" the game was. Most all of those stories, both published and not, were pure hogwash. However, as game design progressed and meshed more and more with the use of miniatures, my own love of gaming fully embraced miniatures of the non-historical genres, in addition to the tried and true Napoleonics and WWII wargaming I was then starting to participate in.

Such games as Warhammer Quest, Battletech, GURPS, Traveller, and Twilight 2000 saw me playing as a bold adventurer, either deep within the lairs of sinister necromancers, as a pilot of a 20 meter tall warmachine, or even as a post-apocalyptic survivor trying to find enough food to last me the winter while evading the encroaching communist soldiers.

These are not the imaginings of a sedentary and disinterested proto-male, but rather the temporary realities of an escapist who ventured forth, for brief moments of time, into other realms and dimensions. Such adventures continue, if not with the same frequency as that of my youth, while I get in the odd miniature wargame once or so a month, alongside the weekly boardgame at the local game store. Still, these excursions are not the limit of my current gaming experiences. On the contrary, my mind is often occupied by unwritten stories of daring-do, political options plotted on a matrix of stimuli and outcomes, or just what color would "go best" for facings and socks on my War of the Spanish Succession miniatures.

Were time not a valuable and perishable commodity, I would continue to write on, but alas, I must needs get back to work. Pray tell, why do YOU play wargames?

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Friedrich: A boardgame review

In addition to miniature wargames, the odd computer game, and non-collectible cardgames, I am an avid player of boardgames. My personal preferences tend to higher level thinking games, where I must not only master the rules of the game, but also attempt to out think my opponent(s). Or at least, I attempt to predict the likely outcomes of choices they are presented and then plan accordingly. Friedrich is just such a game.

As my education background relies heavily upon 17th and 18th century Europe (England and France primarily), the Seven Years War figures largely within my area of interest. Since the period 1740-1763 saw Prussia emerge as a major player in European affairs, Frederick the Great's campaigns are not only intriguing, but also illuminating. At least, to one who has a keen interest in early modern warfare and also geopolitical maneuverings.

With all that stated and out of the way, let's get to the actual game, shall we?

To start, this game is not checkers. It is more of a cross between chess and poker, with a serious grounding in the Seven Years War. It is like chess because the rules are easy to learn (less than 6 page), but difficult to master. It is like poker because much of the game is spent bluffing and calling bluffs, due to the mechanisms surrounding combat resolution.

The game uses no dice. None. Instead, cards are used to recruit replacement troops and supply convoys, and they are also used to resolve the individual battles between opposing armies. Simply, the cards represent your potential for sustained warfare in a game of maneuver and attrition.

The map depicts Hanover, on the left to East Prussia on the right, with the Baltic being just off the map at the top, and Bohemia bordering the bottom. It is a four-player game; Prussia (with Hanover), Russia (with Sweden), Austria (with the Imperial Army), and France.
The colored regions matter, a lot. They represent the ownership of the territory, which is very important for defending objectives, as well as who gains supply from them. Objective cities are marked on the map and may only be defending by the owner of the location. For example, Prussia has an enclave in western Hanover, which cannot be protected by Hanoverian armies, but only by a Prussian army. Armies protect objectives as long as they are withing three movement "dots" and they are of the same ownership. If an enemy is protecting an objective you want to take, you must either maneuver them away or fight (and win) a battle to get them to retreat.

Players begin the game by choosing sides (with the most masochistic or experienced gamer taking on the role of Prussia your first go around). They then secretly allocate the strength of each of their starting armies on the player cards.  You only reveal the strength of your armies when they are directly involved in a battle. After that, your opponents must do their best to remember what your army strength is, if they forget, too bad. Also, no tabletalk concerning strategy, army strength, and cards is allowed. This is a gentleman's game, and one must fight with honor!

Meanwhile, starting with the end of the 6th turn (after France has moved), one Fate card is drawn from the top of the Fate Deck, resolved, and then placed face down at the bottom of the same deck. There are 6 cards which represent major (game changing) events, and 12 minor cards that add a bit of unpredictability. Russia is eliminated from the game when the death of Empress Elizabeth is announced via such a fate card. As this can happen as early as the end of the 6th turn (which happened in the first game I played), Russia is under some pressure.

Essentially, the game ends when ONE of the "allied" players achieves his conditions (captured all of his nation's objectives). Prussia wins if he can prevent that from happening, whether due to Russia, Sweden, and France being eliminated by the fate cards or by running out of time (tournament play is timed using chess clocks, otherwise, if you have 2 hours to play and don't beat Prussia within it, you lose.

Each nation draws a certain number of cards a turn, Prussia starting with the most drawn at seven a turn (which eventually becomes four if the wrong fate cards show up). These cards are critically important to the game.

Looking at the image above, notice the suit markings in blue, on the map? Those determine which card suit you are to play when your army is in battle. You can be playing one suit while your opponent is playing the same or different suit, depending on where their army is located.

One reason why this adds a lot to the game is that you are often in a position of having few or no cards of a suit you really need. Usually, like when I am playing as Prussia, this means Prussia is low on spades (for defending Silesia) or hearts (to defend Magdeburg). Hence, you want to bluff your opponents, by careful maneuver, into thinking you are stronger in a particular suit than you really are. At the same time, the allied players are best served by forcing Prussia to continually fight in one or two suits at most, thus running Prussia out of cards and severely weakening Prussia militarily.

Allies. This means that each of these nations are attacking Prussia, for their own ends. But overt cooperation between players is strongly discouraged. Overt means prior planning or discussion of any kind. In general, the players should learn the game and then play it to win a victory for their nation. Not for Austria to help France win, but to secure a win for Austria alone.


Combat. When opposing armies end up adjacent (not in the same location, but adjacent - new players often get this wrong), they MUST fight a battle. Each player announces the strength of his army (or stacked armies) and the player with the fewer number must either accept defeat or play a card. As successive cards are played, the players attempt to end the battle with a positive value. If you run out of cards and are at a negative value, you lose. For each point of difference, you lose one strength point and are retreated one dot on the map. So, if you lose by four, you lose four strength and your opponent  retreats your army four dots. Yes, your opponent gets to retreat your armies.

An example of combat is: Prussia, with one army of 8 strength, faces off against a stack of three Austrian armies with a total strength of 15. Prussia starts at -7 (the difference between army strengths). Prussia may then either concede defeat (not a good idea) and lose seven strength and be retreated seven dots (which can be REALLY REALLY bad) or play a card (cards are played one at a time and as long as your value is negative, you have the right to play another card). In this case, Prussia plays a 12 of clubs, putting the score of Austria at -5. Now, Austria plays an 11 of spades (look at the image above to see why), placing Prussia at -6. Prussia does not wish to spend any more cards, and since a retreat of one is safe (in the image above), he plays a 5 of clubs, losing one army and is also retreated one space.

There are Reserve cards, which are trumps. They can be played in any suit of a value 1 to 10. The player decides the value, often making the mistake of continuing the battle when he should cut his losses.

Another interesting aspect of this mechanic is "playing to zero." When a player plays a card, bringing the total score to zero, his opponent MUST play a card in suit, if he has it. Otherwise, the battle ends with no losses or retreat for either side. This is a way to force your opponent to play more cards in suit than they might have intended. It is advisable to do this if you feel your opponent is weaker in suit than you are, otherwise, you may play more cards yourself, to your own detriment.

Anyhow. I have played this game eight times, four as Prussia. While I have not yet lost as Prussia, I have come very close to losing three times. I made the beginner mistake of playing too many of my cards in early battle, when I should have taken a -1 result. Oh, losses are replaced by spending 6 points of cards for each strength point of troops. If you only have a 7 point card, you lose the extra point. Also, there is an army maximum for each nation and you can never have more total points on the board than that maximum.

I highly recommend this game. I cannot say enough positive about it. While it does require 2.5-3 hours to play (for experienced players) it is a game you must play at least once. The pressure that Prussia is under, to remember enemy army strength, cards played, but also to maneuver your own forces with skill, is not matched in any other game I have played. By the same token, playing as an ally (I have won twice as Austria) comes with its own set of frustrations. See below:



 photo Friedrich13march14_zps59e4f456.jpg
Here is the game from this past Thursday. I was playing as Russia, Ron as Austria, Brent as France, and Evan as Prussia. I came on strong early, but Austria bid its time, taking advantage of the Prussians turning to face me. France, meanwhile, crept up, putting pressure on Hanover, and won the game. Here, you see France needing one last objective and Brent takes it immediately after this picture was taken. Gaaaah!

So, do yourself and your mates a favor and buy (then play) this game.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

No more crickets...maybe

Yeah, so it's been a few months since my last post.


Well, the time away was not at all planned. My laptop began getting the dreaded BSOD (and still does) at the same time it started to overheat (can cook eggs on the left side of my laptop if I try to start up a game). My usual relationship with electronic devices thus continues to be the bane of my existence.

On a brighter note, I have been teaching in a long-term substitute position for over a month now, teaching seventh grade science. While stressful (it is like trying to keep a pack of lions at bay), it is a job I love to do. The school admin are great, the majority of other teachers are welcoming (probably glad they do not have to teach my classes), and I have a few stand out students who are future movers and shakers in the world. However, the physical and mental exhaustion at the end of the day do require that I take naps more often that I would like.

Yet, I still am able to get in some boardgaming on Thursday nights at the local shop, plus my monthly game club gaming, which is always a miniature wargame.

I do have some game reports I would like to post, but I am currently without a camera and if I had one, my laptop overheating issues would still cause me problems with manipulating images.

I do hope my blogmates are all doing well. I haven't been able to keep up with my reading of their blogs, but promise to do better in the near future.

Rest assured, I have been putting this offline time to use, as I continue to edit and expand the campaign rules for my 1708 imagi-nations campaign, plus continued design work on a few different games.

As a final note, I do wish to state that regardless of our individual political affiliations and nation-state allegiances, my appreciation for your being a gamer still welcomes you as a boon companion and beau adventurer. The current situation in the Ukraine has many on edge and some highly contentious, but you will find none of that here.

Until the next time, Cheers!